<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problem of the Footnote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.veprek.com/history-and-new-media/the-problem-of-the-footnote/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.veprek.com/history-and-new-media/the-problem-of-the-footnote</link>
	<description>staying connected</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:44:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SaS</title>
		<link>http://www.veprek.com/history-and-new-media/the-problem-of-the-footnote/comment-page-1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>SaS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 23:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veprek.com/2007/02/06/the-problem-of-the-footnote/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the shout out about my Blog design, they had that in wordpress&#039; little gallery, I was very surprised. And to continue on your thought, I too learn a lot from the footnotes, sometimes more than I do from the text itself, especially if it is a book that only tangentially relates to my topic of interest or research. That way, when I get to a part I feel I can use in my own work, a long and elaborate footnotes is just what the doctor ordered. Now, for only a couple, thumbing to the back would not be that bad. But what if a whole chapter relates to my topic? Or even worse, several small parts in multiple chapters? Now, when I get to a point in my career where I can read books for my own use only and not for class, going to just those parts that I need will be fine. But what if that book is for class and I am supposed to read all of it (or at least a decent chunk while skimming the rest)? Then that endnotes format can really put a cramp in one&#039;s reading style!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the shout out about my Blog design, they had that in wordpress&#8217; little gallery, I was very surprised. And to continue on your thought, I too learn a lot from the footnotes, sometimes more than I do from the text itself, especially if it is a book that only tangentially relates to my topic of interest or research. That way, when I get to a part I feel I can use in my own work, a long and elaborate footnotes is just what the doctor ordered. Now, for only a couple, thumbing to the back would not be that bad. But what if a whole chapter relates to my topic? Or even worse, several small parts in multiple chapters? Now, when I get to a point in my career where I can read books for my own use only and not for class, going to just those parts that I need will be fine. But what if that book is for class and I am supposed to read all of it (or at least a decent chunk while skimming the rest)? Then that endnotes format can really put a cramp in one&#8217;s reading style!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
