<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s better when you have content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.veprek.com/history-and-new-media/its-better-when-you-have-content/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.veprek.com/history-and-new-media/its-better-when-you-have-content</link>
	<description>staying connected</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:53:38 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Levasseur</title>
		<link>http://www.veprek.com/history-and-new-media/its-better-when-you-have-content/comment-page-1#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Levasseur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 14:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/30/its-better-when-you-have-content/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>You have outdone all of us with your wonderful site, Laura. This much-improved version of the site has straightforward navigation, an elegant and clean look, and very appropriate design. I hope to learn a little about how your designer&#039;s mind approaches things like this. I think my site is fairly basic, and doesn&#039;t really integrate enough of the feel of the time into it&#039;s design. I&#039;m so happy to have your work to look at and see how to think in different terms. I agree with Jenny on the challenges to putting your historian&#039;s cap aside for a bit to think about design, and I&#039;m happy we&#039;ve had your good examples of design to challenge us in that respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have outdone all of us with your wonderful site, Laura. This much-improved version of the site has straightforward navigation, an elegant and clean look, and very appropriate design. I hope to learn a little about how your designer&#8217;s mind approaches things like this. I think my site is fairly basic, and doesn&#8217;t really integrate enough of the feel of the time into it&#8217;s design. I&#8217;m so happy to have your work to look at and see how to think in different terms. I agree with Jenny on the challenges to putting your historian&#8217;s cap aside for a bit to think about design, and I&#8217;m happy we&#8217;ve had your good examples of design to challenge us in that respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.veprek.com/history-and-new-media/its-better-when-you-have-content/comment-page-1#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 13:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/30/its-better-when-you-have-content/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I think the French Revolution redesign is fantastic. Good job!

I think I&#039;m still a little bit vague about the purpose of this class. I guess I have a different expectation as a history PhD and historian--I want to learn how to present good history, not how to design. I agree that design is important, but design is nothing without content. Because this class is in the history department, I have different expectations than if it were in a design department. I&#039;m a huge believer in crossing disciplines, but I want to learn more history-based design. Is that possible, or is it all just design?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the French Revolution redesign is fantastic. Good job!</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m still a little bit vague about the purpose of this class. I guess I have a different expectation as a history PhD and historian&#8211;I want to learn how to present good history, not how to design. I agree that design is important, but design is nothing without content. Because this class is in the history department, I have different expectations than if it were in a design department. I&#8217;m a huge believer in crossing disciplines, but I want to learn more history-based design. Is that possible, or is it all just design?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.veprek.com/history-and-new-media/its-better-when-you-have-content/comment-page-1#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 02:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/30/its-better-when-you-have-content/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>The French Revolution redesign looks great, It seems the information  architecture is a lot more straightforward. That the CHNM redesign was frustrating reinforces the point that you can&#039;t do justice to design without the content. 

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The French Revolution redesign looks great, It seems the information  architecture is a lot more straightforward. That the CHNM redesign was frustrating reinforces the point that you can&#8217;t do justice to design without the content. </p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
