<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is interactivity always a good thing?</title>
	<link>http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/08/is-interactivity-always-a-good-thing/</link>
	<description>staying connected</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Playin' around on the Web &#171; de-Constructing History 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/08/is-interactivity-always-a-good-thing/#comment-79</link>
		<author>Playin' around on the Web &#171; de-Constructing History 2.0</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/08/is-interactivity-always-a-good-thing/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>[...] Jakob Nielsen&#8217;s Participation Inequality article, unlike some of my fellow classmates (see Laura&#8217;s Blog and Jenny&#8217;s comment on Laura&#8217;s Blog, among others). See my comment on Laura&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Jakob Nielsen&#8217;s Participation Inequality article, unlike some of my fellow classmates (see Laura&#8217;s Blog and Jenny&#8217;s comment on Laura&#8217;s Blog, among others). See my comment on Laura&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tad</title>
		<link>http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/08/is-interactivity-always-a-good-thing/#comment-78</link>
		<author>tad</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/08/is-interactivity-always-a-good-thing/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>I'm glad to see someone else had trouble downloading the Brown article. (And I can't even blame not having my password or whatnot-- I just couldn't find the full text anywhere.)

The rest worked alright for me, but as Jenny noted in a random on-campus conversation with me today, I too was bothered with the postage-stamp sized display.

I think that the link between pedagogy and interactivity is sort of self-evident. Students learn a more valuable lesson when they are forced to participate in the creation of knowledge than by any sort of rote learning, or acceptance of textbooks as unbiased accounts of fact. I think the problem is that the level that gaming's approached in the last few years is only recently starting to approach the levels of complexity that we need to make them into valuable teaching tools. (This is the theme of my post in my blog, which should be up in the next hour-- please feel free to stop by and check it out.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see someone else had trouble downloading the Brown article. (And I can&#8217;t even blame not having my password or whatnot&#8211; I just couldn&#8217;t find the full text anywhere.)</p>
<p>The rest worked alright for me, but as Jenny noted in a random on-campus conversation with me today, I too was bothered with the postage-stamp sized display.</p>
<p>I think that the link between pedagogy and interactivity is sort of self-evident. Students learn a more valuable lesson when they are forced to participate in the creation of knowledge than by any sort of rote learning, or acceptance of textbooks as unbiased accounts of fact. I think the problem is that the level that gaming&#8217;s approached in the last few years is only recently starting to approach the levels of complexity that we need to make them into valuable teaching tools. (This is the theme of my post in my blog, which should be up in the next hour&#8211; please feel free to stop by and check it out.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaS</title>
		<link>http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/08/is-interactivity-always-a-good-thing/#comment-77</link>
		<author>SaS</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/08/is-interactivity-always-a-good-thing/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Hey Laura, you vent all you want! That's what Blogs are for, no?

Anyway, the main comment I had is about Nielsen's &lt;a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Participation Inequality article&lt;/a&gt;. I would put myself in that middle group (the 9%-er) because I leave posts and messages several places but only from time to time. I rarely leave book reviews, although there are a few I intend to write this summer for some books I have read over the past year that I really want to get the word out about, some good, some bad.

Sorry, off topic...I agree with you that the tone is a bit off-putting, people can do whatever they want and if they want to lurk, they can lurk. I guess he was trying to help out those businesses that can't seem to figure out ways to get meaningful participation and good data. The point he makes at the end, though, I really liked: making it easier to contribute (Netflix) and making contributing a side-show (Amazon). These have been gold mines and they are soooo easy. I mean, with Amazon, you just buy things and BOOM, you have gone into the database as having bought that book! Then, folks like me who are trying to delve into a new subject area can see what folks who bought this one book I know about also bought in that same arena!! Does that make any sense? I hope so, cuz it's late...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Laura, you vent all you want! That&#8217;s what Blogs are for, no?</p>
<p>Anyway, the main comment I had is about Nielsen&#8217;s <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html" rel="nofollow">Participation Inequality article</a>. I would put myself in that middle group (the 9%-er) because I leave posts and messages several places but only from time to time. I rarely leave book reviews, although there are a few I intend to write this summer for some books I have read over the past year that I really want to get the word out about, some good, some bad.</p>
<p>Sorry, off topic&#8230;I agree with you that the tone is a bit off-putting, people can do whatever they want and if they want to lurk, they can lurk. I guess he was trying to help out those businesses that can&#8217;t seem to figure out ways to get meaningful participation and good data. The point he makes at the end, though, I really liked: making it easier to contribute (Netflix) and making contributing a side-show (Amazon). These have been gold mines and they are soooo easy. I mean, with Amazon, you just buy things and BOOM, you have gone into the database as having bought that book! Then, folks like me who are trying to delve into a new subject area can see what folks who bought this one book I know about also bought in that same arena!! Does that make any sense? I hope so, cuz it&#8217;s late&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maureen Guignon</title>
		<link>http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/08/is-interactivity-always-a-good-thing/#comment-76</link>
		<author>Maureen Guignon</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/08/is-interactivity-always-a-good-thing/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Laura, thanks for the laugh though I am sure that is not what you intended in your post. I also could not access the Josh Brown article and I did know my password. I will read it tomorrow before class in the library. 

I did not mind sliding the mouse around for the Lost Museum because it was not a long visit. I am spending way more time in Myst with the endless sliding of mouse and waiting for the click. So, your comment on Myst's similar problem was very welcome as I feel as if I am wasting so much time waiting that could be spent finding whatever it is I am looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura, thanks for the laugh though I am sure that is not what you intended in your post. I also could not access the Josh Brown article and I did know my password. I will read it tomorrow before class in the library. </p>
<p>I did not mind sliding the mouse around for the Lost Museum because it was not a long visit. I am spending way more time in Myst with the endless sliding of mouse and waiting for the click. So, your comment on Myst&#8217;s similar problem was very welcome as I feel as if I am wasting so much time waiting that could be spent finding whatever it is I am looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny Reeder</title>
		<link>http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/08/is-interactivity-always-a-good-thing/#comment-75</link>
		<author>Jenny Reeder</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/08/is-interactivity-always-a-good-thing/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>[...] with Laura&#8217;s reaction to the readings and site visits. I posted my comment to her blog here. I liked what Karin had to say about transferring skills used in Myst design to virtual [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] with Laura&#8217;s reaction to the readings and site visits. I posted my comment to her blog here. I liked what Karin had to say about transferring skills used in Myst design to virtual [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny Reeder</title>
		<link>http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/08/is-interactivity-always-a-good-thing/#comment-74</link>
		<author>Jenny Reeder</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.veprek.com/2007/04/08/is-interactivity-always-a-good-thing/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Laura,

I agree with you on many fronts. I think that Participation Inequality raised some interesting questions, but I think most people are fine with not being entirely interactive with a website. I, too, am a lurker, and THAT'S OK. That said, I do think the web provides an incredible interactive forum and there are many ways to participate in that interaction. But it should be according to individual need and desire. I want to be in charge of where I spend my time and energy, no matter how intriguing or interactive a website is.

Also, I, too, love the concept of a virtual museum. I think the Lost Museum was a cool idea, but it was quite difficult to maneuver in the small screen and I never could quite figure out the clues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura,</p>
<p>I agree with you on many fronts. I think that Participation Inequality raised some interesting questions, but I think most people are fine with not being entirely interactive with a website. I, too, am a lurker, and THAT&#8217;S OK. That said, I do think the web provides an incredible interactive forum and there are many ways to participate in that interaction. But it should be according to individual need and desire. I want to be in charge of where I spend my time and energy, no matter how intriguing or interactive a website is.</p>
<p>Also, I, too, love the concept of a virtual museum. I think the Lost Museum was a cool idea, but it was quite difficult to maneuver in the small screen and I never could quite figure out the clues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
